Home
Classifieds
Contests
Subscribe
Work with us
Clear,63°
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Scott Brinton
Missing in action: the great climate debate

I have to hand it to the coal industry.

The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity –– comprising coal producers like Arch Coal, electric companies like Buckeye Power, heavy-equipment manufacturers like Caterpillar and transporters like the Union Pacific Railroad –– have inundated the airwaves with so many commercials promoting “clean coal” this presidential election season that even the staunchest of green-energy advocates apparently have started to believe the fairy tale that we can produce clean energy from a dirty fossil fuel.

I just have to keep reminding myself that there’s no such thing as clean coal –– and there never will be.

According to a recent study conducted by The New York Times, the coal, oil and natural gas industries have spent $153 million in recent months promoting their fossil-fuels-are-beautiful mantra, while advocates of clean-energy sources –– wind, solar and geothermal –– have spent $41 million on advertising.

Compare that with 2008, when climate change and green energy were part and parcel of then Sen. Barack Obama’s and Sen. John McCain’s campaign rhetoric. Four years ago, commercials advocating alternative energy topped $152 million, compared with $109 million spent by the fossil-fuel industries.

In last week’s debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney at Hofstra University, we heard plenty of talk about the skyrocketing cost of gasoline. Both candidates said they favor more drilling to increase petroleum production and control prices at the pump. Call it Drill, Baby, Drill 2.0.

With all due respect to the candidates, that’s a bunch of malarkey, but I’ll get to that in a minute.

First, what happened between 2008 and 2012 that transformed our national discourse from a heated, albeit semi-sane, conversation about the link between fossil-fuel combustion and global warming to one of dead silence on the issue? At Hofstra, there was nary a mention of climate change, even during the furious exchanges on U.S. energy policy.

Comments

3 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
mimitoby1

I couldn't agree more. When I heard the term "clean coal" I couldn't imagine what new technology was used to wash the coal so that the soot and smoke emanating from the burning of coal would suddenly become "clean". Yes. malarkey iris. Clean coal is fiction!

Thursday, October 25, 2012 | Report this
mimitoby1

I couldn't agree more. When I heard the term "clean coal" I couldn't imagine what new technology was used to wash the coal so that the soot and smoke emanating from the burning of coal would suddenly become "clean". Yes. malarkey it is. Clean coal is fiction!

Thursday, October 25, 2012 | Report this
logicalthinker

clean coal as it is refered to is the addtion of filters to capture harmful emmissions the same technology is used on modern diesel trucks and cars and is effective.Our government should not be using OUR money to invest in clean energy,billions given to privite companies which give back a large campain contrbution than go belly up,where did all that money go,in the ceos bank.The solar companies in this country cannot compete with china which is the big picture of all american manufacturing we can not compete and untill that issue gets addressed it will just be the same result

Monday, October 29, 2012 | Report this
Terms of Use | Advertising | Careers | Contact Us | Community Links © 2015 Richner Communications, Inc.